ع
The analysis highlighted how the Middle East financial sector operates in a transformed risk landscape shaped by persistent geopolitical tensions that have disrupted energy flows and trade routes, leading to rapid repricing in energy and credit markets across the GCC, MENA region and beyond. According to the piece, many institutions continue to apply resilience models predicated on short-term disruptions and historical data patterns, an approach that has grown increasingly difficult to sustain. Central banks encounter limited policy options as an oil price shock simultaneously drives inflation higher and dampens growth, while GCC currency pegs tie local monetary settings closely to decisions by the US Federal Reserve.
This dynamic reduces available flexibility at a time when domestic conditions call for greater responsiveness, the analysis stated. Across the sector, commercial banks contend with heightened credit exposures in aviation, logistics, tourism and real estate, even as trade finance conditions tighten due to repriced insurance risks. The insurance industry itself faces activation of war-exclusion clauses, surging premiums and reduced capacity in vulnerable segments, resulting in risk accumulation within the broader financial system rather than its dispersal.
Investor portfolios have similarly adjusted through increased allocations to traditional safe havens and reduced tolerance for regional exposures, moves that can intensify local market volatility when undertaken collectively. Despite these pressures, the GCC banking sector has demonstrated notable resilience, with EY reporting an average return on equity of 13.2 percent for the first half of 2025 supported by stronger non-interest income. S&P Global Ratings indicated in November 2025 that credit fundamentals remain stable heading into 2026, although a modest easing in profitability is anticipated as interest rates decline.
A KPMG review of 2025 full-year results for listed GCC banks recorded double-digit growth in assets alongside improved equity returns and prudent risk provisioning, forecasting continued emphasis on cost discipline and asset quality oversight through the current year. The May analysis advocated transitioning toward treating geopolitical uncertainty as an enduring input to strategic choices, employing expanded stress scenarios that encompass extended supply chain interruptions and sustained capital flow swings. Such practices are altering capital deployment and risk valuation methodologies at leading institutions.
Operational investments in digital platforms, cloud-based systems and decentralised models have enabled uninterrupted service delivery and coordination during periods of physical strain, elevating these technologies from efficiency tools to essential resilience components, the analysis observed. Clients increasingly seek not only transactional execution but advisory support to navigate volatility and safeguard value, rewarding institutions equipped to furnish such direction. These developments are gradually repositioning GCC banks toward a larger intermediation function in the region as some global counterparts scale back involvement.
Sovereign-linked entities have concurrently assumed greater roles in reinsurance markets and extended-duration investments where private sector retreat has created gaps, illustrating a reconfiguration of risk-bearing capacities. Patrycja Oselkowska, the financial services and growth leader at Deloitte Middle East whose perspective underpins the published analysis, stressed the necessity of integrating resilience into routine decision processes, operational design and capital planning. The assessment concluded that entities acting promptly to align with this evolved paradigm stand to preserve stakeholder confidence and identify fresh prospects as markets stabilise.
